Was jesus gay article-Sexuality of Jesus - Wikipedia

McCall, a self-proclaimed ex-reverend, on June 4, It is despicable to even say or suggest this of Our Lord but we need to be prepared to refute such vulgarity in view of the gay agendas desire to twist everything to fit their perverted view of the world. I am responding to the content of his blog post since he sent it to me for my comments. I always promote honest and courteous discourse, seeking the truth with charity and honesty. I hope I have accomplished that in my response below.

Was jesus gay article

Was jesus gay article

One blight on humanity that resulted from this was the obnoxious anti-Semitism that caused the Holocaust, amongst other atrocities. So, you see where I'm coming from? Stem-Cell Research. Even if Jesus viewed homosexuality as a sin, he had a penchant for reaching out to sinners rather than shunning them. Jesus said to love jesis neighbor as yourself. But God doesn't accept us Was jesus gay article on our performance. Suffering was my theme. Queer doesn't necessarily mean sexual orientation, but it can include that.

Cum for me stories. Navigation menu

Why the church is the best place to question your gender identity. Cancel at any Thirsty fists to avoid future billing. The Sacredness of Marriage. Reuse this content. Or, for that matter, an elaborate position on human sexuality that takes into account all the advances the social sciences have made in the past few decades. In his book " Gays and Grays ," the articcle of how the Californian parish came to accept the homosexual jesuw, Godfrey openly dissents from Church teaching on homosexuality:. Are there passages of Scripture that should be read as if they Ws describing historical events that actually transpired in this world? Jesus was a rabbi, a teacher, and pretty much every Was jesus gay article at the time was married. By using this site, you jexus to the Terms of Use Was jesus gay article Privacy Policy. Godfrey has been promoting homosexuality since the s. He preached the importance of charity and loving one another. Government and God. It takes discipline, scholarship, prayer, and sometimes creativity to interpret the Bible in a way that makes sense to us today. The Purpose of Education. The Bible we have today is an anthology of many different writings created and edited by a diverse group of writers and redactors from different socioeconomic and historical strata.

On the issue of the sexuality of Jesus , the traditional understanding of Christian churches is that Jesus did not marry and remained celibate until his death.

  • San Francisco ChurchMilitant.
  • I truly believe that Jesus of Nazareth was not a straight man and there are plenty of facts to prove it.
  • Screengrab via Amazon.
  • On the issue of the sexuality of Jesus , the traditional understanding of Christian churches is that Jesus did not marry and remained celibate until his death.

McCall, a self-proclaimed ex-reverend, on June 4, It is despicable to even say or suggest this of Our Lord but we need to be prepared to refute such vulgarity in view of the gay agendas desire to twist everything to fit their perverted view of the world.

I am responding to the content of his blog post since he sent it to me for my comments. I always promote honest and courteous discourse, seeking the truth with charity and honesty. I hope I have accomplished that in my response below.

I am writing this in a few free hours I have in Jerusalem. A busy day starts tomorrow but I thought I would respond in the few hours I have available. As I write I am looking out at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre where Jesus was crucified, died and was buried before rising from the dead. I am writing this in context — not only the context of Scripture and history, but the context of the land of Israel where I spend a large part of my time.

I will pray for McCall while here. We will be called bigots and old fashioned. When they marshall Scripture verses against you, will you be prepared to respond? That is why I am refuting this otherwise foolish and waste-of-time article. We who are not caught up in the gay life or the support thereof, need to know what we know and why. I have no doubt that McCall does not accept the Bible as the inspired word of God, nor does he really care about what it says or why.

His website is called Debunking Christianity which is what he has set out to do. He is homosexual and that is how he finds his identity, and it is his driving motivation—to eliminate biblical arguments against homosexuality; rather to twist the Bible like a rubber nose to suit his purposes.

Any discussion of Scripture by McCall is simply to twist it to fit his agenda and to confuse those who try to read it honestly. It is certainly not my objective to attack homosexuals or the gay lifestyle. However, it is being forced down my throat no pun intended. I hope to engage the conversation in a rational, reasoned, cordial and biblical way. I decided the best way to respond to his attempt to paint Jesus as a homosexual was to address his claims paragraph by paragraph.

I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt whenever possible, but to be exacting and uncompromising when necessary. To read my full biblical refutation, click HERE. Many of those eagerly agreeing with Mr. McCall, will know nothing of the strength of Catholicism vs.

Protestant Christianity. He knows nothing of the difference between Catholic and Protestant Christianity. He always argues as if the proof for Christianity were Bible Only.

The Church existed years before the Bible was canonized. The gospels were used in the liturgy. Their historicity is no doubt. Check it out. Hi Steve. I was reading another blog, I dont remember which, but an author stated that he did not like the word gay, to be used. The word certainly does not mean happy when used in their context. Hi… A very interesting read — thank you for taking the time to present your views cogently and without hysteria.

I like to hear and read all sorts of views on an issue because there are few things on which my opinions are fixed and unwavering. I am 31 and gay. I am interested in your personal beliefs against what you call the gay culture and lifestyle, and that it is being rammed down your throat.

Thanks again for an interesting contribution…. There is a side of Islam that is very pro homosexual. It is not a sister religion of Christianity. Dear Steve, Thanks for your patient deliberations around the blog by McCall. I preface my remarks by describing myself as a 'progressive' Christian. Isn't it whitewashing just a little to say that the inconsistencies between the Gospels are merely different perspectives of the same historical event?

Each author had his own audience, perspective and goal. But that does not negate the historicity or the accuracy of their individual Gospels]. Is it not also true that none of the Gospel writers ever met an eye witness to the life of Jesus? Not only this, none of the Gospel writers even used the Aramaic language that Jesus spoke. And further, the Gospels weren't written until at least one generation after Jesus life. I consider that this opens up much of the Gospels to cultural bias.

At the turn of the last century it became popular the date the gospels late, even into the second century. That scholarship has pretty much been dismissed and much earlier dates of been assigned to the Gospels, especially among conservatives, which I tend to be.

I wrote a page book and the Gospel of St. In it I conclude that it was written by John who was the fisherman a new Jesus. Therefore, at least two of the riders were eyewitnesses of the whole life of Jesus and the other two were reliable witnesses of eyewitnesses. I was recently at an Anglican Church here in Australia when the preacher, an ordained Anglican priest, explained how he had previously had many discussions with a Jewish man whose comment had been: "Every Christian should have a Jewish guide when reading the Gospel of Matthew!

The earliest Christians commented that Matthews first gospel was written in Hebrew or Aramaic. But Matthew was writing to the Jewish people of the first century to convince them that Jesus was there king and Messiah]. Over time, Gentiles have interpreted the Jewish-based texts as being literal truths, rather than spiritual truths.

One blight on humanity that resulted from this was the obnoxious anti-Semitism that caused the Holocaust, amongst other atrocities. And I would also contest that it was not the Gospel writers or the New Testament that cause the Holocaust.

It was the perversion of Nazism which actually rooted itself back in the individualism preached by Martin Luther and the protestant rebellion. You seem so confident of your interpretation, but I believe that any theologian which I am not needs to consider that possibility that the New Testament is not pure historic fact, and focus rather on the spiritual truths from the teachings and attitudes of Jesus.

For example, the role of women in the Church has been suppressed by a male-centric hierarchy for over nineteen centuries, and yet Jesus Himself chose to speak to women when other Jewish men would not. Also, He first revealed Himself to women after the resurrection. Thanks again for your comments and that we may Disagree I appreciate your irenic tone and your love of God and search for the truth.

Interesting that the present crisis in the Catholic Church is precisely over this particular matter. Makes you wonder! Was Jesus a Homosexual? Geoffrey, Thanks for your comments below. I inserted a few responses in brackets… Dear Steve, Thanks for your patient deliberations around the blog by McCall.

But that does not negate the historicity or the accuracy of their individual Gospels] Is it not also true that none of the Gospel writers ever met an eye witness to the life of Jesus?

But Matthew was writing to the Jewish people of the first century to convince them that Jesus was there king and Messiah] Over time, Gentiles have interpreted the Jewish-based texts as being literal truths, rather than spiritual truths. Why do you have to lie on the Word in denigrating and oppressing the sexual minorities? All Rights Reserved. WordPress Admin.

Mathew would have been Matt and Thomas would have been Tom. Christianity is in the Constitution. At the very least, Jesus was queer. America's Greatest Threat. The intimate relationship with the beloved disciple points in that direction. Personal Responsibility.

Was jesus gay article

Was jesus gay article. More From Thought Catalog

.

What the Church of Jesus Christ Believes about Same-Sex Attraction

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints acknowledges that same-sex attraction is a sensitive issue that requires kindness, compassion and understanding. The website mormonandgay. The Church does not take a position on the cause of same-sex attraction. In , Elder Dallin H. Feelings of same-sex attraction are not a sin. Elder M. The attraction itself is not a sin, but acting on it is. Even though individuals do not choose to have such attractions, they do choose how to respond to them.

While same-sex attraction is not a sin, it can be a challenge. The parent of a child who experiences same-sex attraction or identifies as gay should choose to love and embrace that child. As a community of Church members, Latter-day Saints should create a welcoming community. Those who experience same-sex attraction or identify as gay can fully participate in the Church.

These members may receive Church callings. If they are worthy and qualified in every other way, they may also hold temple recommends and receive temple ordinances. To download media files, please first review and agree to the Terms of Use. Download a photo or video by clicking or tapping on it.

To download all photos or videos related to this article, select the links at the bottom of each section. Visit mormonandgay. Additional Resources MormonAndGay.

Oaks and Elder Lance B. Download Media Close.

Was jesus gay article

Was jesus gay article

Was jesus gay article